Skip to content
ınfyaıAcademyby Board Infinity
Menu
How we teach · The InfyAI curriculum framework

Human judgement × AI capability.

AI will not replace people who work well with it. It will take over much of the work of people who don’t. We train both halves of the equation, and assess each one separately.

What people bring

  • Strategy and vision
  • Ethics and judgement
  • Creativity and taste
  • Empathy and trust

What AI brings

  • Speed of execution
  • Data analysis
  • Scale
  • Pattern recognition
01 Four pillars

The same four pillars, weighted by degree.

Shares of studio credits. Engineers lean on technology; MBAs lean on business. Both clear a floor in every pillar.

Build with technology

Python and JavaScript, data and SQL, AI engineering, agents, testing and verification

45%

Build business

Customers, unit economics, selling, product and ventures

25%

Understand the world

How one industry works, and responsible use of data and AI in it

15%

Lead and communicate

English under pressure, specs, client conversations, ownership

15%

The core: AI-native judgement. Specify what to build, verify that it works, decide what to do about it. It is not a fifth subject. Every artefact a student submits carries a verification log, and the log is graded in every pillar.

02 The studio, not the lecture

One studio a semester, built around real work.

Integrated three- to four-credit studios replace a stack of thin courses. A studio has a client, a brief, a deadline and a review, the way work does.

About a day a week

One integrated studio per semester, inside the regular timetable, supported by short self-paced modules.

Co-taught

University faculty set the academic frame. Practitioners bring live cases and review the work.

On campus

In-person studios with your cohort. Online is support, never the main event.

Mapped for accreditation

Course outcomes mapped to programme outcomes for the Board of Studies and NBA files.

A course asks

Did you attend, and can you recall it in an exam hall?

A studio asks

Did you ship something that works, can you prove it, and can you defend it without AI?

03 Agentic workflows

From chat to action.

Asking an AI a question is the easy part. The work employers now pay for is designing systems where an agent plans, acts through real tools, checks its own results and hands the hard cases to a person. Every student builds one, starting in Year 1.

Worked example: chase a clinic’s overdue invoices

What the agent does

Takes a goal a person sets: collect payments on invoices more than 30 days overdue, without upsetting long-standing patients.

What the student is graded on

Writing a goal precise enough to test, including what the agent must never do.

Level 1 · MakerBuilds with AI assistants and explains what the model is doing
Level 2 · BuilderBuilds an app that answers from real documents
Level 3 · OperatorDeploys an agent with tools, guardrails and an evaluation suite
Level 4 · ProfessionalRuns an AI deployment inside a client’s own environment
04 Competencies

Thirteen competencies, four levels of evidence.

Each level is defined by work a reviewer can see, not by hours attended. B.Tech students climb all four over four years. MBA students start at Level 2 on the business rows and aim for Level 4.

Build with technology

Verification and debugging

L1 · Maker

Spots wrong AI output in a familiar domain

L2 · Builder

Writes tests and evaluations before trusting output

L3 · Operator

Finds the root cause in AI-written code without AI help

L4 · Professional

Sets the verification standard for a team

Employers see these as twelve first-round competencies on Roles and skills.

05 Assessment

Every skill, tested twice.

With AI, students show they can direct it, check it and measure the result. Without it, they show they understand what they built.

SkillWith AI: direct, verify, measureWithout AI: explain, debug, defend
SoftwareShip a feature with an AI coding assistant, with tests that prove it worksFind and fix a bug in the same code, live, on paper or a bare editor
DataUse AI to draft the analysis, then reconcile every figure to the sourceWrite the SQL by hand and explain why the numbers moved
AgentsBuild an agent and an evaluation suite that catches its failuresWalk a reviewer through what the agent does when a tool fails
BusinessUse AI for research and a first draft of the business caseDefend the case to a practitioner panel, including what you would not do
Every artefactShip it with a verification log: what was checked, how, and what failedTalk a reviewer through the log and re-run one check live

How a studio grade is made

The thing you built works (35%) Explain and fix it without AI (25%) Defend it to a panel (20%) Process and verification log (10%) Peer or client review (10%)
17%

Why the second test matters. In a randomised trial with high-school students, those who practised with an unguarded AI assistant scored 17% lower on a later exam taken without it. A version that gave hints instead of answers removed most of that harm. Bastani et al., PNAS 2025

06 AI use by year

Learn it first. Then let the agents work.

The trial above is why Year 1 is different. Students first build the understanding AI cannot give them, then use AI the way employers do.

Year 1 · Tutor mode

Hints, not answers

AI explains and questions; students write, read and debug the code and the analysis themselves. Debugging and explanation carry the most weight in the no-AI tests.

Year 2 onward · Work mode

Full agents, with logs

Students build with coding agents and workflow tools the way employers do, and keep a log of every check they ran on the output.

07 Tools

We teach the category, not the brand.

The best model this term may not be the best next term. Students learn one tool per category deeply, compare it with a second, and learn to choose. The stack is reviewed every term.

AI coding assistants and agentsAn IDE assistant and a terminal coding agent
General AI assistantsTwo, used side by side to cross-check each other
Building with modelsA model API, retrieval over documents, tool calling, evaluations
Code and deliveryPython, SQL, JavaScript, Git, containers, one cloud
Data and dashboardsSpreadsheet modelling and one BI tool
Automation and business systemsA workflow tool, a CRM, a marketing automation platform
08 Signature experiences

Six things you will remember doing.

Each one produces evidence an employer can check: a ledger, a deployed agent, a client’s sign-off, a recording of a defence.

Year 1

First Rupee venture

Start a venture with a small seed and earn your first rupee from a real customer. Graded on process, not revenue.

Every year

Agent Lab

Ship a deployed agent each year, each with harder tools, stricter guardrails and a stronger evaluation suite.

Year 2

SME consulting sprint

A paid sprint for a small business: map the process, automate what is worth automating, and hand it over working.

Year 2

Bharat immersion

Time inside a business outside the metros, to see how money, risk and work really move in India.

Year 4

Paid industry semester

A semester inside an employer on real work, [where the partner structure allows].

Year 4

Demo Day

Present what you built to employers and investors, and defend it live. Ventures that survive get an incubator route.

09 For colleges

A premium track, under your academic authority.

InfyAI delivers a quarter to two-fifths of the credits inside your regular, on-campus B.Tech, BBA or MBA. We bring the studios, the practitioners, the employer sprints and the evidence trail.

You award the degreeUnder your own regulations. We never co-award.
Your Board of Studies approvesEvery course, with outcome mapping ready for the file.
Your faculty co-teachYour name comes first; practitioners join the studio.
A pilot before a commitmentA Year-1 pilot before any four-year agreement.
Accreditation-readyCourse outcomes mapped to programme outcomes for NBA.
An evidence trailVerification logs and defences on file for every student.